From 3b96e2519d137dd34f144b56bb403087556292c3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: paroche <46547072+paroche@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 21:46:58 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] Update article.md

Maybe this is what you want. "Complexity" is singular, so if that's the antecedent, one would use "was".
---
 1-js/06-advanced-functions/09-call-apply-decorators/article.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/1-js/06-advanced-functions/09-call-apply-decorators/article.md b/1-js/06-advanced-functions/09-call-apply-decorators/article.md
index ada01f91..3ca987c4 100644
--- a/1-js/06-advanced-functions/09-call-apply-decorators/article.md
+++ b/1-js/06-advanced-functions/09-call-apply-decorators/article.md
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ From an outside code, the wrapped `slow` function still does the same. It just g
 To summarize, there are several benefits of using a separate `cachingDecorator` instead of altering the code of `slow` itself:
 
 - The `cachingDecorator` is reusable. We can apply it to another function.
-- The caching logic is separate, it did not increase the complexity of `slow` itself (if there were any).
+- The caching logic is separate, it did not increase the complexity of `slow` itself (if there was any).
 - We can combine multiple decorators if needed (other decorators will follow).