From 582e8f67afda6bb6a0340dfd738a0df117517d2d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: paroche <46547072+paroche@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 23:40:12 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] Update solution.md

Change "so to say" to "so to speak".
---
 .../4-new-object-same-constructor/solution.md                   | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/1-js/08-prototypes/02-function-prototype/4-new-object-same-constructor/solution.md b/1-js/08-prototypes/02-function-prototype/4-new-object-same-constructor/solution.md
index 43190e16..35572240 100644
--- a/1-js/08-prototypes/02-function-prototype/4-new-object-same-constructor/solution.md
+++ b/1-js/08-prototypes/02-function-prototype/4-new-object-same-constructor/solution.md
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ alert( user2.name ); // Pete (worked!)
 
 It worked, because `User.prototype.constructor == User`.
 
-..But if someone, so to say, overwrites `User.prototype` and forgets to recreate `"constructor"`, then it would fail.
+..But if someone, so to speak, overwrites `User.prototype` and forgets to recreate `"constructor"`, then it would fail.
 
 For instance: