From 586a68c9d190f35f9fba044289c1a4d9494b67ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Valentin Khokhlov Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 19:11:02 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] it is syntactic sugar, not syntax --- 1-js/01-getting-started/1-intro/article.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/1-js/01-getting-started/1-intro/article.md b/1-js/01-getting-started/1-intro/article.md index 1e2e97d7..10bd54fe 100644 --- a/1-js/01-getting-started/1-intro/article.md +++ b/1-js/01-getting-started/1-intro/article.md @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ Modern tools make the transpilation very fast and transparent, actually allowing Examples of such languages: -- [CoffeeScript](http://coffeescript.org/) is a "syntax sugar" for JavaScript, it introduces shorter syntax, allowing to write more precise and clear code. Usually Ruby devs like it. +- [CoffeeScript](http://coffeescript.org/) is a "syntactic sugar" for JavaScript, it introduces shorter syntax, allowing to write more precise and clear code. Usually Ruby devs like it. - [TypeScript](http://www.typescriptlang.org/) is concentrated on adding "strict data typing", to simplify development and support of complex systems. It is developed by Microsoft. - [Dart](https://www.dartlang.org/) is a standalone language that has its own engine that runs in non-browser environments (like mobile apps). It was initially offered by Google as a replacement for JavaScript, but as of now, browsers require it to be transpiled to JavaScript just like the ones above.