From 9a64c1b267999673f8a1e6e14eac61b328dd2377 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: K-Sato <32632542+K-Sato1995@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 15:38:41 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] Fix some typos

---
 1-js/03-code-quality/03-comments/article.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/1-js/03-code-quality/03-comments/article.md b/1-js/03-code-quality/03-comments/article.md
index 930ff929..f977a5e4 100644
--- a/1-js/03-code-quality/03-comments/article.md
+++ b/1-js/03-code-quality/03-comments/article.md
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ complex;
 code;
 ```
 
-But in good code the amount of such "explanatory" comments should be minimal. Seriously, code should be easy to understand without them.
+But in good code, the amount of such "explanatory" comments should be minimal. Seriously, the code should be easy to understand without them.
 
 There's a great rule about that: "if the code is so unclear that it requires a comment, then maybe it should be rewritten instead".