diff --git a/1-js/02-first-steps/08-comparison/article.md b/1-js/02-first-steps/08-comparison/article.md index 6a69c95e..1b95a743 100644 --- a/1-js/02-first-steps/08-comparison/article.md +++ b/1-js/02-first-steps/08-comparison/article.md @@ -1,18 +1,18 @@ # Comparisons -Many comparison operators we know from maths: +We know many comparison operators from maths: - Greater/less than: a > b, a < b. - Greater/less than or equals: a >= b, a <= b. -- Equality check is written as `a == b` (please note the double equation sign `=`. A single symbol `a = b` would mean an assignment). -- Not equals. In maths the notation is , in JavaScript it's written as an assignment with an exclamation sign before it: a != b. +- Equals: `a == b` (please note the double equals sign `=`. A single symbol `a = b` would mean an assignment). +- Not equals. In maths the notation is , but in JavaScript it's written as an assignment with an exclamation sign before it: a != b. ## Boolean is the result -Just as all other operators, a comparison returns a value. The value is of the boolean type. +Like all other operators, a comparison returns a value. In this case, the value is a boolean. - `true` -- means "yes", "correct" or "the truth". -- `false` -- means "no", "wrong" or "a lie". +- `false` -- means "no", "wrong" or "not the truth". For example: @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ alert( result ); // true ## String comparison -To see which string is greater than the other, the so-called "dictionary" or "lexicographical" order is used. +To see whether a string is greater than another, JavaScript uses the so-called "dictionary" or "lexicographical" order. In other words, strings are compared letter-by-letter. @@ -45,29 +45,27 @@ alert( 'Bee' > 'Be' ); // true The algorithm to compare two strings is simple: -1. Compare first characters of both strings. -2. If the first one is greater(or less), then the first string is greater(or less) than the second. We're done. -3. Otherwise if first characters are equal, compare the second characters the same way. -4. Repeat until the end of any string. -5. If both strings ended simultaneously, then they are equal. Otherwise the longer string is greater. +1. Compare the first character of both strings. +2. If the first character from the first string is greater (or less) than the other string's, then the first string is greater (or less) than the second. We're done. +3. Otherwise, if both strings' first characters are the same, compare the second characters the same way. +4. Repeat until the end of either string. +5. If both strings end at the same length, then they are equal. Otherwise, the longer string is greater. -In the example above, the comparison `'Z' > 'A'` gets the result at the first step. - -Strings `"Glow"` and `"Glee"` are compared character-by-character: +In the examples above, the comparison `'Z' > 'A'` gets to a result at the first step while the strings `"Glow"` and `"Glee"` are compared character-by-character: 1. `G` is the same as `G`. 2. `l` is the same as `l`. 3. `o` is greater than `e`. Stop here. The first string is greater. ```smart header="Not a real dictionary, but Unicode order" -The comparison algorithm given above is roughly equivalent to the one used in book dictionaries or phone books. But it's not exactly the same. +The comparison algorithm given above is roughly equivalent to the one used in dictionaries or phone books, but it's not exactly the same. -For instance, case matters. A capital letter `"A"` is not equal to the lowercase `"a"`. Which one is greater? Actually, the lowercase `"a"` is. Why? Because the lowercase character has a greater index in the internal encoding table (Unicode). We'll get back to specific details and consequences in the chapter . +For instance, case matters. A capital letter `"A"` is not equal to the lowercase `"a"`. Which one is greater? The lowercase `"a"`. Why? Because the lowercase character has a greater index in the internal encoding table JavaScript uses (Unicode). We'll get back to specific details and consequences of this in the chapter . ``` ## Comparison of different types -When compared values belong to different types, they are converted to numbers. +When comparing values of different types, JavaScript converts the values to numbers. For example: @@ -76,7 +74,9 @@ alert( '2' > 1 ); // true, string '2' becomes a number 2 alert( '01' == 1 ); // true, string '01' becomes a number 1 ``` -For boolean values, `true` becomes `1` and `false` becomes `0`, that's why: +For boolean values, `true` becomes `1` and `false` becomes `0`. + +For example: ```js run alert( true == 1 ); // true @@ -101,24 +101,24 @@ alert( Boolean(b) ); // true alert(a == b); // true! ``` -From JavaScript's standpoint that's quite normal. An equality check converts using the numeric conversion (hence `"0"` becomes `0`), while `Boolean` conversion uses another set of rules. +From JavaScript's standpoint, this result is quite normal. An equality check converts values using the numeric conversion (hence `"0"` becomes `0`), while the explicit `Boolean` conversion uses another set of rules. ```` ## Strict equality -A regular equality check `==` has a problem. It cannot differ `0` from `false`: +A regular equality check `==` has a problem. It cannot differentiate `0` from `false`: ```js run alert( 0 == false ); // true ``` -The same thing with an empty string: +The same thing happens with an empty string: ```js run alert( '' == false ); // true ``` -That's because operands of different types are converted to a number by the equality operator `==`. An empty string, just like `false`, becomes a zero. +This happens because operands of different types are converted to numbers by the equality operator `==`. An empty string, just like `false`, becomes a zero. What to do if we'd like to differentiate `0` from `false`? @@ -132,19 +132,19 @@ Let's try it: alert( 0 === false ); // false, because the types are different ``` -There also exists a "strict non-equality" operator `!==`, as an analogy for `!=`. +There is also a "strict non-equality" operator `!==` analogous to `!=`. -The strict equality check operator is a bit longer to write, but makes it obvious what's going on and leaves less space for errors. +The strict equality operator is a bit longer to write, but makes it obvious what's going on and leaves less room for errors. ## Comparison with null and undefined Let's see more edge cases. -There's a non-intuitive behavior when `null` or `undefined` are compared with other values. +There's a non-intuitive behavior when `null` or `undefined` are compared to other values. For a strict equality check `===` -: These values are different, because each of them belongs to a separate type of its own. +: These values are different, because each of them is a different type. ```js run alert( null === undefined ); // false @@ -158,9 +158,9 @@ For a non-strict check `==` ``` For maths and other comparisons `< > <= >=` -: Values `null/undefined` are converted to a number: `null` becomes `0`, while `undefined` becomes `NaN`. +: `null/undefined` are converted to numbers: `null` becomes `0`, while `undefined` becomes `NaN`. -Now let's see funny things that happen when we apply those rules. And, what's more important, how to not fall into a trap with these features. +Now let's see some funny things that happen when we apply these rules. And, what's more important, how to not fall into a trap with them. ### Strange result: null vs 0 @@ -172,15 +172,15 @@ alert( null == 0 ); // (2) false alert( null >= 0 ); // (3) *!*true*/!* ``` -Yeah, mathematically that's strange. The last result states that "`null` is greater than or equal to zero". Then one of the comparisons above must be correct, but they are both false. +Mathematically, that's strange. The last result states that "`null` is greater than or equal to zero", so one of the comparisons above it must be correct, but they are both false. -The reason is that an equality check `==` and comparisons `> < >= <=` work differently. Comparisons convert `null` to a number, hence treat it as `0`. That's why (3) `null >= 0` is true and (1) `null > 0` is false. +The reason is that an equality check `==` and comparisons `> < >= <=` work differently. Comparisons convert `null` to a number, treating it as `0`. That's why (3) `null >= 0` is true and (1) `null > 0` is false. On the other hand, the equality check `==` for `undefined` and `null` is defined such that, without any conversions, they equal each other and don't equal anything else. That's why (2) `null == 0` is false. ### An incomparable undefined -The value `undefined` shouldn't participate in comparisons at all: +The value `undefined` shouldn't be compared to other values: ```js run alert( undefined > 0 ); // false (1) @@ -188,25 +188,25 @@ alert( undefined < 0 ); // false (2) alert( undefined == 0 ); // false (3) ``` -Why does it dislike a zero so much? Always false! +Why does it dislike zero so much? Always false! -We've got these results because: +We get these results because: -- Comparisons `(1)` and `(2)` return `false` because `undefined` gets converted to `NaN`. And `NaN` is a special numeric value which returns `false` for all comparisons. -- The equality check `(3)` returns `false`, because `undefined` only equals `null` and no other value. +- Comparisons `(1)` and `(2)` return `false` because `undefined` gets converted to `NaN` and `NaN` is a special numeric value which returns `false` for all comparisons. +- The equality check `(3)` returns `false` because `undefined` only equals `null` and no other value. ### Evade problems -Why did we observe these examples? Should we remember these peculiarities all the time? Well, not really. Actually, these tricky things will gradually become familiar over time, but there's a solid way to evade any problems with them. +Why did we go over these examples? Should we remember these peculiarities all the time? Well, not really. Actually, these tricky things will gradually become familiar over time, but there's a solid way to evade problems with them: Just treat any comparison with `undefined/null` except the strict equality `===` with exceptional care. -Don't use comparisons `>= > < <=` with a variable which may be `null/undefined`, unless you are really sure what you're doing. If a variable can have such values, then check for them separately. +Don't use comparisons `>= > < <=` with a variable which may be `null/undefined`, unless you're really sure of what you're doing. If a variable can have these values, check for them separately. ## Summary -- Comparison operators return a logical value. +- Comparison operators return a boolean value. - Strings are compared letter-by-letter in the "dictionary" order. - When values of different types are compared, they get converted to numbers (with the exclusion of a strict equality check). -- Values `null` and `undefined` equal `==` each other and do not equal any other value. -- Be careful when using comparisons like `>` or `<` with variables that can occasionally be `null/undefined`. Making a separate check for `null/undefined` is a good idea. +- The values `null` and `undefined` equal `==` each other and do not equal any other value. +- Be careful when using comparisons like `>` or `<` with variables that can occasionally be `null/undefined`. Checking for `null/undefined` separately is a good idea.