diff --git a/1-js/03-code-quality/03-comments/article.md b/1-js/03-code-quality/03-comments/article.md
index 29ba701f..0d11c6c5 100644
--- a/1-js/03-code-quality/03-comments/article.md
+++ b/1-js/03-code-quality/03-comments/article.md
@@ -125,25 +125,25 @@ Describe the architecture
 Document function parameters and usage
 : There's a special syntax [JSDoc](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JSDoc) to document a function: usage, parameters, returned value.
 
-    For instance:
-    ```js
-    /**
-     * Returns x raised to the n-th power.
-     *
-     * @param {number} x The number to raise.
-     * @param {number} n The power, must be a natural number.
-     * @return {number} x raised to the n-th power.
-     */
-    function pow(x, n) {
-      ...
-    }
-    ```
+For instance:
+```js
+/**
+ * Returns x raised to the n-th power.
+ *
+ * @param {number} x The number to raise.
+ * @param {number} n The power, must be a natural number.
+ * @return {number} x raised to the n-th power.
+ */
+function pow(x, n) {
+  ...
+}
+```
 
-    Such comments allow us to understand the purpose of the function and use it the right way without looking in its code.
+Such comments allow us to understand the purpose of the function and use it the right way without looking in its code.
 
-    By the way, many editors like [WebStorm](https://www.jetbrains.com/webstorm/) can understand them as well and use them to provide autocomplete and some automatic code-checking.
+By the way, many editors like [WebStorm](https://www.jetbrains.com/webstorm/) can understand them as well and use them to provide autocomplete and some automatic code-checking.
 
-    Also, there are tools like [JSDoc 3](https://github.com/jsdoc3/jsdoc) that can generate HTML-documentation from the comments. You can read more information about JSDoc at <http://usejsdoc.org/>.
+Also, there are tools like [JSDoc 3](https://github.com/jsdoc3/jsdoc) that can generate HTML-documentation from the comments. You can read more information about JSDoc at <http://usejsdoc.org/>.
 
 Why is the task solved this way?
 : What's written is important. But what's *not* written may be even more important to understand what's going on. Why is the task solved exactly this way? The code gives no answer.