jeena/en.javascript.info
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Added whitespaces

Browse source 
It's really just a matter of taste, I think it's more consistent and legible to use whitespaces before and after the operators.
This commit is contained in:
Jay 2018-11-09 09:22:16 +01:00 • committed by GitHub
parent 089dcb6a12
commit 113afd5e31
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
1 changed files with 8 additions and 8 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

16
1-js/02-first-steps/12-while-for/2-which-value-while/solution.md
View file

@ -7,11 +7,11 @@ The task demonstrates how postfix/prefix forms can lead to different results whe
while (++i < 5) alert( i ); while (++i < 5) alert( i );
``` ```
The first value is `i=1`, because `++i` first increments `i` and then returns the new value. So the first comparison is `1 < 5` and the `alert` shows `1`. The first value is `i = 1`, because `++i` first increments `i` and then returns the new value. So the first comparison is `1 < 5` and the `alert` shows `1`.
Then follow `2,3,4…` -- the values show up one after another. The comparison always uses the incremented value, because `++` is before the variable. Then follow `2, 3, 4…` -- the values show up one after another. The comparison always uses the incremented value, because `++` is before the variable.
Finally, `i=4` is incremented to `5`, the comparison `while(5 < 5)` fails, and the loop stops. So `5` is not shown. Finally, `i = 4` is incremented to `5`, the comparison `while(5 < 5)` fails, and the loop stops. So `5` is not shown.
2. **From 1 to 5** 2. **From 1 to 5**
```js run ```js run
@ -19,12 +19,12 @@ The task demonstrates how postfix/prefix forms can lead to different results whe
while (i++ < 5) alert( i ); while (i++ < 5) alert( i );
``` ```
The first value is again `i=1`. The postfix form of `i++` increments `i` and then returns the *old* value, so the comparison `i++ < 5` will use `i=0` (contrary to `++i < 5`). The first value is again `i = 1`. The postfix form of `i++` increments `i` and then returns the *old* value, so the comparison `i++ < 5` will use `i = 0` (contrary to `++i < 5`).
But the `alert` call is separate. It's another statement which executes after the increment and the comparison. So it gets the current `i=1`. But the `alert` call is separate. It's another statement which executes after the increment and the comparison. So it gets the current `i = 1`.
Then follow `2,3,4…` Then follow `2, 3, 4…`
Let's stop on `i=4`. The prefix form `++i` would increment it and use `5` in the comparison. But here we have the postfix form `i++`. So it increments `i` to `5`, but returns the old value. Hence the comparison is actually `while(4 < 5)` -- true, and the control goes on to `alert`. Let's stop on `i = 4`. The prefix form `++i` would increment it and use `5` in the comparison. But here we have the postfix form `i++`. So it increments `i` to `5`, but returns the old value. Hence the comparison is actually `while(4 < 5)` -- true, and the control goes on to `alert`.
The value `i=5` is the last one, because on the next step `while(5 < 5)` is false. The value `i = 5` is the last one, because on the next step `while(5 < 5)` is false.