replace side-effect with side effect
This commit is contained in:
parent
291b5c05b9
commit
4aa9f818e8
10 changed files with 10 additions and 10 deletions
|
@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
|
|||
|
||||
From a technical point of view, this is identical to the example above. Surely, we can just wrap the code in an `if` block instead of using `continue`.
|
||||
|
||||
But as a side-effect, this created one more level of nesting (the `alert` call inside the curly braces). If the code inside of `if` is longer than a few lines, that may decrease the overall readability.
|
||||
But as a side effect, this created one more level of nesting (the `alert` call inside the curly braces). If the code inside of `if` is longer than a few lines, that may decrease the overall readability.
|
||||
````
|
||||
|
||||
````warn header="No `break/continue` to the right side of '?'"
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue