up
This commit is contained in:
parent
4272b7bb13
commit
508969c13f
168 changed files with 340 additions and 10 deletions
|
@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
|
|||
1. Yes, true. The element `elem.lastChild` is always the last one, it has no `nextSibling`, so if there are children, then yes.
|
||||
2. No, wrong, because `elem.children[0]` is the first child among elements. But there may be non-element nodes before it. So `previousSibling` may be a text node.
|
||||
|
||||
Please note that for both cases if there are no children, then there will be an error. For instance, if `elem.lastChild` is `null`, we can't access `elem.lastChild.nextSibling`.
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
|
|||
importance: 5
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# The sibling question
|
||||
|
||||
If `elem` -- is an arbitrary DOM element node...
|
||||
|
||||
- Is it true that `elem.lastChild.nextSibling` is always `null`?
|
||||
- Is it true that `elem.children[0].previousSibling` is always `null` ?
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue