jeena/en.javascript.info
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Spelling Continued

Browse source 
Checked some spelling further along in the article files. Made some
small grammatical fixes, but mostly spelling.
This commit is contained in:
reigningmetal 2017-06-12 20:26:14 -04:00
parent 42d9f16fe3
commit c97f53563c
19 changed files with 31 additions and 31 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
2-ui/1-document/09-size-and-scroll/article.md
View file

@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ They include the content width together with paddings, but without the scrollbar
On the picture above let's first consider `clientHeight`: it's easier to evaluate. There's no horizontal scrollbar, so it's exactly the sum of what's inside the borders: CSS-height `200px` plus top and bottom paddings (`2*20px`) total `240px`.
Now `clientWidth` -- here the content width is not `300px`, but `284px`, because `16px` are occupied by the scrollbbar. So the sum is `284px` plus left and right paddings, total `324px`.
Now `clientWidth` -- here the content width is not `300px`, but `284px`, because `16px` are occupied by the scrollbar. So the sum is `284px` plus left and right paddings, total `324px`.
**If there are no paddings, then `clientWidth/Height` is exactly the content area, inside the borders and the scrollbar (if any).**
@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ Why we should use geometry properties instead? There are two reasons:
And there's one more reason: a scrollbar. Sometimes the code that works fine without a scrollbar starts to bug with it, because a scrollbar takes the space from the content in some browsers. So the real width available for the content is *less* than CSS width. And `clientWidth/clientHeight` take that into account.
...But with `getComputedStyle(elem).width` the situation is different. Some browsers (e.g. Chrome) return the real inner width, minus the scrollbar, and some of them (e.g. Firefox) -- CSS width (ignore the scrollbar). Such cross-browser differences is the reason not to use `getComputedStyle`, but rather rely on geometry propeties.
...But with `getComputedStyle(elem).width` the situation is different. Some browsers (e.g. Chrome) return the real inner width, minus the scrollbar, and some of them (e.g. Firefox) -- CSS width (ignore the scrollbar). Such cross-browser differences is the reason not to use `getComputedStyle`, but rather rely on geometry properties.
```online
If your browser reserves the space for a scrollbar (most browsers for Windows do), then you can test it below.