Fix a possible typo in 1.6.1
This commit is contained in:
parent
15767fc3cf
commit
d6f98e1ed6
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ The new current execution context is on top (and bold), and previous remembered
|
||||||
When we finish the subcall -- it is easy to resume the previous context, because it keeps both variables and the exact place of the code where it stopped.
|
When we finish the subcall -- it is easy to resume the previous context, because it keeps both variables and the exact place of the code where it stopped.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
```smart
|
```smart
|
||||||
Here in the picture we use the word "line", as our example there's only one subcall in line, but generally a single line of code may contain multiple subcalls, like `pow(…) + pow(…) + somethingElse(…)`.
|
Here in the picture we use the word "line", as in our example there's only one subcall in line, but generally a single line of code may contain multiple subcalls, like `pow(…) + pow(…) + somethingElse(…)`.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
So it would be more precise to say that the execution resumes "immediately after the subcall".
|
So it would be more precise to say that the execution resumes "immediately after the subcall".
|
||||||
```
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue