Maybe it should be marked as code
This commit is contained in:
parent
2cca9a9d09
commit
f613e03f87
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ userGuest.admin?.(); // nothing (no such method)
|
|||
|
||||
Here, in both lines we first use the dot (`userAdmin.admin`) to get `admin` property, because we assume that the user object exists, so it's safe read from it.
|
||||
|
||||
Then `?.()` checks the left part: if the admin function exists, then it runs (that's so for `userAdmin`). Otherwise (for `userGuest`) the evaluation stops without errors.
|
||||
Then `?.()` checks the left part: if the `admin` function exists, then it runs (that's so for `userAdmin`). Otherwise (for `userGuest`) the evaluation stops without errors.
|
||||
|
||||
The `?.[]` syntax also works, if we'd like to use brackets `[]` to access properties instead of dot `.`. Similar to previous cases, it allows to safely read a property from an object that may not exist.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue