jeena/en.javascript.info
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Packages Wiki Activity Actions

more typos

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Thierry Parmentelat 2017-06-01 08:17:51 +02:00
parent dc1a4fb6ad
commit fb6b393f0c
6 changed files with 23 additions and 23 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
1-js/07-object-oriented-programming/10-class-inheritance/article.md
View file

@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ setTimeout(function() { super.stop() }, 1000);
With constructors, things are is a little bit tricky.
Till now, `Rabbit` had no its own `constructor`.
Till now, `Rabbit` did not have its own `constructor`.
According to the [specification](https://tc39.github.io/ecma262/#sec-runtime-semantics-classdefinitionevaluation), if a class extends another class and has no `constructor`, then the following `constructor` is generated:
@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ Yeah, indeed, let's ask ourselves, how it could technically work? When an object
Maybe we can get it `[[Prototype]]` of `this`, as `this.__proto__.method`? Unfortunately, that won't work.
Let's try to do it. Without classes, using plain objects for sheer simplicity.
Let's try to do it. Without classes, using plain objects for the sake of simplicity.
Here, `rabbit.eat()` should call `animal.eat()` method of the parent object: