Commit graph

3152 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Ilya Kantor
0110927124 fixes 2019-09-02 14:40:56 +03:00
Ilya Kantor
a6a75f30fd
Merge pull request #1304 from DouglasMV/fixes
Fixed a typo
2019-09-02 14:39:24 +03:00
Ilya Kantor
5f540e7210 minor 2019-09-02 14:38:59 +03:00
Ilya Kantor
4d808231b0
Merge pull request #1305 from paroche/patch-9
Update article.md
2019-09-02 14:37:32 +03:00
Ilya Kantor
33c4149533
Merge pull request #1306 from paroche/patch-12
Update article.md
2019-09-02 14:36:57 +03:00
paroche
bcae3c640f
Update article.md 2019-09-01 19:31:28 -06:00
paroche
6292469b88
Update article.md
Qualify that while cachingDecorator() will now work with any number of arguments, the hash() function given will not. Or, perhaps better, could just change the hash function to something like:

function hash(args) {
  return [...args].join();
}
2019-09-01 19:14:59 -06:00
paroche
d27e96cec3
Update article.md
Says "is the same object as:", but what's below is an assignment (that includes an object). I didn't have any problem understanding it, didn't even notice it at first, but I thought it would be more accurate this way without sacrificing clarity.
2019-09-01 18:14:56 -06:00
paroche
25bf9f5afe
Update article.md
1. Since is general statement, thought might be better to use general function name.
2. "Do the following steps" is a bit awkward, in that usually one doesn't "do" steps (but rather "takes", or "follows", or "executes" steps, perhaps). But it does convey the meaning, and perhaps it's a relatively new usage in business or tech that I'm not familiar with. For me, it comes off a bit awkward. Leaving out "steps" works grammatically and preserves the sense. Or could find another verb to replace "do" -- but nothing perfect came to mind. Not that bad the way it is, but since I was already changing the sentence...
2019-09-01 17:46:44 -06:00
Douglas Mariano Valero
e3cec3b488
Fixed a typo 2019-09-01 13:16:04 -03:00
Ilya Kantor
bbdb520e6b
Merge pull request #1301 from paroche/patch-9
Update article.md
2019-09-01 11:37:37 +03:00
Douglas Mariano Valero
7556bda13a
Typo 2019-09-01 01:06:11 -03:00
paroche
ace9460329
Update article.md
Wording of initial explanation of spread operator.
2019-08-31 20:01:01 -06:00
Ilya Kantor
e9ded79b03 fixes 2019-08-30 23:59:08 +03:00
Ilya Kantor
b0d39f8568
Merge pull request #1292 from Violet-Bora-Lee/patch-26
minor
2019-08-30 23:05:40 +03:00
Ilya Kantor
4ed5a0d66e
Merge pull request #1293 from paroche/patch-9
Update article.md
2019-08-30 23:05:26 +03:00
Ilya Kantor
69c7961e1c
Merge pull request #1296 from Violet-Bora-Lee/patch-28
typo
2019-08-30 23:05:12 +03:00
Ilya Kantor
f643be326c minor 2019-08-30 23:04:47 +03:00
Violet.Lee
bfeb7a4baa
typo 2019-08-31 03:31:19 +09:00
paroche
8aca3523fe
Update article.md
Better grammatically.
2019-08-29 19:42:05 -06:00
Violet.Lee
6fc41bac7a
minor 2019-08-30 05:35:48 +09:00
Ilya Kantor
95597b8fda
Merge pull request #1289 from Raggan/Raggan-patch-1
Fixed spelling error
2019-08-29 22:06:05 +03:00
Ilya Kantor
df3260a44e fixes 2019-08-29 20:40:41 +03:00
Simon Holdorf
8b5693dbfe
Fixed spelling error
So here JavaScript assumes that we have a code block, but why there's an error. --> Makes no sense so replaced "but" with "that's"
2019-08-28 21:54:27 +02:00
Ilya Kantor
9f010c6c5e
Merge pull request #1285 from jessepeterman/patch-1
Fix typo
2019-08-28 17:56:24 +03:00
Ilya Kantor
fdcdc12d36
Merge pull request #1287 from gergooo/master
Typo/grammar fix
2019-08-28 17:56:15 +03:00
Ilya Kantor
60a64a9a1a
Merge pull request #1288 from atimidguy/master
Typo/grammar fix
2019-08-28 17:56:03 +03:00
atimidguy
990cc4085c
Update article.md 2019-08-28 20:13:51 +08:00
atimidguy
a3c7eede1b
Merge branch 'master' into atimidguy-patch-2 2019-08-28 19:22:36 +08:00
atimidguy
e3cb02feec
Update article.md
fixed grammaticalmistakes, i.e. changed 'And' to 'and', added missing pronoun 'it' after 'to'.
2019-08-28 19:20:15 +08:00
atimidguy
a750d6f579
fixed missing pronoun 'it'
fixed missing pronoun 'it'
2019-08-28 19:07:51 +08:00
atimidguy
203562bfa6
fixed missing pronoun 'it'
fixed missing pronoun 'it'.
2019-08-28 19:06:30 +08:00
Gergő Ábrahám
f682b125e6
Typo/grammar fix 2019-08-28 12:40:08 +02:00
Jesse Peterman
dbc67c6f9f
Fix typo
fix typo in comment to match code example
2019-08-27 23:47:05 -07:00
Ilya Kantor
2b14644218
Merge pull request #1280 from cluah/patch-1
fix incorrect description
2019-08-28 08:47:18 +03:00
Ilya Kantor
85cb006832
Merge pull request #1281 from cluah/patch-2
improve description
2019-08-28 08:46:55 +03:00
Ilya Kantor
5062d3f31c
Merge pull request #1284 from paroche/patch-8
Update article.md
2019-08-28 08:45:15 +03:00
Ilya Kantor
b218b185b0 fixes #1261 2019-08-28 08:44:35 +03:00
paroche
3b96e2519d
Update article.md
Maybe this is what you want. "Complexity" is singular, so if that's the antecedent, one would use "was".
2019-08-27 21:46:58 -06:00
cluah
bf230df7a9
improve description
Change the order between ´body´ and ´step´. Also delete the phrase '... but before the condition check', which seems a bit confusing.
2019-08-27 18:26:49 -04:00
cluah
a301935df2
minor 2019-08-27 17:43:54 -04:00
Michael Gellings
7b7fdca923 clarify type conversion headings 2019-08-27 15:33:47 +02:00
Ilya Kantor
2d3f7cc7ce minor 2019-08-27 10:46:45 +03:00
Ilya Kantor
5c8d24a582 closes #1271 2019-08-27 08:20:18 +03:00
Ilya Kantor
c048701b9a
Merge pull request #1268 from paroche/patch-6
Update article.md
2019-08-26 14:28:38 +03:00
Ilya Kantor
f8f402b61d
Merge pull request #1269 from paroche/patch-7
Update article.md
2019-08-26 14:28:13 +03:00
paroche
a736f71fb4
Update article.md
Correct spelling of "standardized".
2019-08-24 22:40:21 -06:00
paroche
d3b5889e65
Update article.md 2019-08-23 19:55:06 -06:00
paroche
78a6ffad05
Update article.md
Change to wording about maximum recursion depth.
2019-08-22 19:48:21 -06:00
Ilya Kantor
8c30654f69 fix 2019-08-22 17:17:13 +03:00