Changes to conclussion
This commit is contained in:
parent
3615801a1a
commit
21c4c7353d
1 changed files with 2 additions and 4 deletions
|
@ -8135,13 +8135,11 @@ This thesis concludes that it is reasonable to use the same tools as those
|
||||||
\end_layout
|
\end_layout
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin_layout Standard
|
\begin_layout Standard
|
||||||
In the current state the GGS prototype is not scalable, however it seems
|
In the current state, the GGS prototype is not scalable.
|
||||||
possible to implement scalability with more time available.
|
The GGS is however prepared for scaling due to its overall structure.
|
||||||
The implementation of scalability could be performed in two different ways,
|
The implementation of scalability could be performed in two different ways,
|
||||||
either to scale one instance of the GGS or to scale by creating new instances
|
either to scale one instance of the GGS or to scale by creating new instances
|
||||||
and support communication among them.
|
and support communication among them.
|
||||||
There are one case where problems may occur, modules in the GGS can not
|
|
||||||
be divided; therefore the scaling of one instance will be limited.
|
|
||||||
\end_layout
|
\end_layout
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin_layout Standard
|
\begin_layout Standard
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue