Peter Roche
f9b91e2a6d
Update article.md
...
'forbids to apply' -> 'forbids applying'
2019-11-05 22:53:56 -07:00
Peter Roche
4541b0481c
Update solution.md
...
Putting `<tbody>` in backticks. Wasn't showing.
2019-11-03 22:52:10 -07:00
Peter Roche
580221f6fb
Update article.md
...
Adding some mention of implicit `<tbody>` element. Comes up later in Modifying the Document task #10 solution.
2019-11-03 22:46:29 -07:00
Peter Roche
9e7235f765
Update article.md
...
re-edit: on tables lead-in.
2019-11-03 22:33:11 -07:00
Ilya Kantor
70ca842bef
minor
2019-10-26 12:37:45 +03:00
Peter Roche
f954987ba7
Update article.md
...
Further tweaks in the insertAdjacent... neighborhood of Summary.
2019-10-23 20:33:53 -06:00
Peter Roche
c8e062f499
Update article.md
...
Spelling things out a bit more for insertAdjacentHTML
2019-10-23 20:26:15 -06:00
Peter Roche
f6ead73b4e
Update article.md
...
"Although, " to "However,".
2019-10-23 20:15:43 -06:00
Peter Roche
cc3795f5f4
Update article.md
...
Changed spelling of "neighbor" from British ("neighbour") to American.
I think that's how you want it. Otherwise some other stuff has to be switched to British.
2019-10-23 20:04:30 -06:00
paroche
093238039e
Update article.md
...
"an arbitrary HTML" -> "arbitrary HTML"
or could have said "an arbitrary piece of HTML" or something like that.
2019-10-21 20:20:31 -06:00
paroche
f430bea35c
Update article.md
...
Actually removing articles ("the"s). Rare! Usage was inconsistent from line to line -- some had "the node" and some just had "node". I'd say in this case, since `node` is formatted as code, it's intended to be an identifier (rather than a type of thing), so should stand alone. That is, if `node` **stands** for the node, don't use "the", but if 'node' just means "some node", do use "the node".
2019-10-21 19:31:43 -06:00
paroche
022c037925
Update article.md
...
Rewording example lead-in.
2019-10-21 18:36:06 -06:00
paroche
7a0fbdb407
Update article.md
...
Take 2 on 'There should be "loading" indications...." line.
2019-10-21 14:11:56 -06:00
paroche
09d2e96c51
Update article.md
...
Sp., small change(s). Looks like someone else fixed main problem w/ "There should be..." sentence before I got here :-)
2019-10-21 14:01:56 -06:00
Ilya Kantor
2cbed98e58
minor
2019-10-21 16:15:04 +03:00
Ilya Kantor
2d77eb7ddf
Merge pull request #1483 from Ghost-017/patch-5
...
minor
2019-10-21 16:14:13 +03:00
Ghost-017
14e82d1ddd
minor
2019-10-20 17:52:58 +08:00
Ghost-017
aae1e268c3
Update article.md
2019-10-20 17:47:48 +08:00
Ilya Kantor
30e3fa7237
minor
2019-10-20 09:27:30 +03:00
Ilya Kantor
4c9c943c87
Merge pull request #1484 from Ghost-017/patch-6
...
minor
2019-10-20 09:25:32 +03:00
Ilya Kantor
ebd69e25bf
Merge pull request #1486 from javascript-tutorial/paroche-patch-4
...
Update article.md
2019-10-20 09:24:18 +03:00
paroche
8826f07c53
Update article.md
...
"**and** more attributes...
2019-10-19 21:19:40 -06:00
paroche
676ffb718a
Update article.md
...
Wording on why use attribute vs classes question
2019-10-19 21:15:54 -06:00
paroche
79e244757f
Update article.md
...
"there's a lot" -> "there are a lot",
2019-10-19 20:29:34 -06:00
paroche
15d0394161
Update article.md
...
On first and second reading, I found this section very confusing. After looking up outerHTML on Mozilla and doing some tests, I came to understand what was being said (I think). Here I'm proposing some changes to, I hope, make it clearer (plus some little grammar changes).
2019-10-19 19:39:59 -06:00
paroche
4088e5df84
Merge pull request #1482 from Ghost-017/patch-4
...
minor
2019-10-19 17:59:57 -06:00
Ilya Kantor
f0e848ad68
minor
2019-10-20 00:33:40 +03:00
Ilya Kantor
f75439fa0c
Merge pull request #1485 from Ghost-017/patch-7
...
minor
2019-10-20 00:33:14 +03:00
Ilya Kantor
1fe192d546
Merge pull request #1475 from javascript-tutorial/paroche-patch-3
...
Update article.md
2019-10-19 20:25:40 +03:00
Ghost-017
a9609842f7
minor
2019-10-19 20:27:51 +08:00
Ghost-017
e8d86d93d2
minor
2019-10-19 20:09:37 +08:00
Ghost-017
5b795f776e
minor
2019-10-19 19:54:24 +08:00
Ghost-017
58c91c3c9f
minor changes in grammar
2019-10-19 18:41:30 +08:00
Ilya Kantor
d5f4fe9e18
minor
2019-10-19 13:15:53 +03:00
Ilya Kantor
ee6f0ac2be
minor
2019-10-18 19:56:48 +03:00
Ilya Kantor
a52a64375c
minor
2019-10-18 19:48:17 +03:00
Ilya Kantor
01352c1c38
minor
2019-10-18 19:39:47 +03:00
paroche
33e4cc258b
Update article.md
...
"...`1` for elements,`3` for text nodes, and a few others ..."
2019-10-17 23:31:06 -06:00
paroche
4452139ca0
Update article.md
...
Changed 'XHTML' to 'in XML mode' in title to match contents. 'XHTML' isn't mentioned anywhere else in the article except in that title. So either change it to 'XML' or explain the relationship?
2019-10-17 23:10:07 -06:00
paroche
eb2b6c9514
Update article.md
...
"an array", "filter out"
2019-10-17 17:02:34 -06:00
Ilya Kantor
bb974189a1
fixes #1469
2019-10-17 08:43:29 +03:00
paroche
43e092a3cd
Update article.md
...
Continued refinement to that one sentence. However, I'm confused, in that I don't see my changes on the web page, even though I'm committing directly to the master branch.
2019-10-15 13:22:54 -06:00
paroche
f09f188b4f
Update article.md
...
Remove 'for that'. Added comma.
Changed my mind about ":". Went back and changed file. Not sure how this works now w/ 2 commits.
2019-10-14 22:54:34 -06:00
paroche
297cbfb8d6
Update article.md
...
Remove 'for that'.
2019-10-14 22:45:00 -06:00
paroche
64d9b6ff24
Update article.md
...
Tables are... -- remove 'of that', change "." to ":".
2019-10-14 22:39:38 -06:00
Ilya Kantor
650e78818c
elks -> elk
2019-10-14 12:15:00 +03:00
Alexey Pyltsyn
a0bfa924a1
Fix header level
2019-10-13 20:11:15 +03:00
paroche
8baaa2f404
Update article.md
...
us, them, commas
2019-10-12 22:24:17 -06:00
Ilya Kantor
c3fadb7dc1
minor
2019-10-11 09:15:33 +03:00
Ilya Kantor
6d44c1e1ac
fixes
2019-10-10 17:29:27 +03:00
