Ilya Kantor
994390265a
fixes #1669
2019-12-27 11:40:59 +03:00
Ilya Kantor
ce8e68f21c
minor fixes
2019-11-28 13:56:48 +03:00
Ilya Kantor
d5195b5d59
closes #1524 #716
2019-10-29 06:32:44 +03:00
Ilya Kantor
3483424f62
Merge pull request #1476 from hrodward/patch-9
...
Update article.md
2019-10-19 20:25:02 +03:00
Ilya Kantor
6634181d6d
Merge pull request #1477 from hrodward/patch-10
...
Update article.md
2019-10-19 20:24:41 +03:00
Ilya Kantor
edfc79d4dc
Merge pull request #1479 from hrodward/patch-11
...
Update task.md
2019-10-19 20:23:55 +03:00
hrodward
2ffc997180
Update solution.md
...
Minor grammar fixes and suggestions
2019-10-18 14:58:37 +02:00
hrodward
a2b45a852f
Update task.md
...
Minor grammar; removed unnecessary semicolon; added (best practices) semicolon
2019-10-18 11:37:45 +02:00
hrodward
5ac537f211
Update article.md
...
Deleted the full-stop as it's one sentence only
2019-10-18 08:37:21 +02:00
hrodward
81a250337d
Update article.md
...
There has to be a scary CPU-intensive task here, otherwise the example wouldn't make sense. Hence the suppression of "can";
I have also removed "actually" because in this context it would be interpreted as "to your surprise", which is not the case here
2019-10-18 08:07:53 +02:00
Artur Haurylkevich
ee80b55a1b
add test case for debounce
2019-10-17 22:01:44 +03:00
Ilya Kantor
7418213b66
re-import images from Sketch (no changes)
2019-10-10 17:08:16 +03:00
paroche
cdde99fd19
Update task.md
...
Wording was ungrammatical and hard to understand. I made my best guess as to what you want to say. However, it is not clear from the description or the examples whether the debounce wrapper should inhibit calls attempted ms milliseconds after the last call that wasn't ignored, or ms milliseconds after the last call that was attempted, even if it was ignored. I would think it would be the former, but the example could go either way. If the f(4) example used 1000 or 1001 ms and still runs, that would clear it up. If it has to be 1100 like it is, that would suggest that it's the second scenario above. In my propsed change I preserved the ambiguity.
2019-09-02 19:49:54 -06:00
Ilya Kantor
ade541bd61
closes #1294
2019-09-02 23:57:08 +03:00
Ilya Kantor
b2cedf7b0a
closes #1308
2019-09-02 23:43:51 +03:00
paroche
bcae3c640f
Update article.md
2019-09-01 19:31:28 -06:00
paroche
6292469b88
Update article.md
...
Qualify that while cachingDecorator() will now work with any number of arguments, the hash() function given will not. Or, perhaps better, could just change the hash function to something like:
function hash(args) {
return [...args].join();
}
2019-09-01 19:14:59 -06:00
paroche
3b96e2519d
Update article.md
...
Maybe this is what you want. "Complexity" is singular, so if that's the antecedent, one would use "was".
2019-08-27 21:46:58 -06:00
Ilya Kantor
9bfc8cfa9c
minor
2019-08-11 14:24:31 +03:00
Ilya Kantor
4d44df6a3a
Embed font to SVG
2019-08-11 14:17:38 +03:00
Ilya Kantor
e6e562040d
minor
2019-08-01 13:51:03 +03:00
Ilya Kantor
446154fc69
up
2019-07-31 23:31:16 +03:00
Ilya Kantor
3ba28aa104
images to svg
2019-07-28 15:42:37 +03:00
Ilya Kantor
f8570ae3a0
fixes
2019-05-11 11:28:46 +03:00
Ilya Kantor
6b9515ffd0
minor
2019-04-30 08:25:34 +02:00
Ilya Kantor
8f13d61a8b
Sketch editor update (no important image changes)
2019-04-05 09:17:57 +03:00
Mau Di Bert
1161b75825
Update task.md
...
typo
2019-03-05 07:53:17 -03:00
Ilya Kantor
be9c5a7b5f
re-export pictures
2019-03-02 23:36:52 +03:00
Mau Di Bert
7c97edc67c
typo
2019-03-02 08:54:52 -03:00
Ilya Kantor
408ba7d4e4
make sure a solution always shows up, use "demo" if exists
2019-02-21 19:35:04 +03:00
user
5dddf7de89
Grammar
2018-12-06 18:06:29 -05:00
Ilya Kantor
d0fcf522da
sketch downgrade to 50 for good arrows, closes #494
2018-10-09 12:00:34 +03:00
Ilya Kantor
aa43deef3b
closes #516
2018-10-07 20:19:48 +03:00
Ben James
e4a4426ff1
Use gender neutral pronouns
2018-08-02 15:15:35 +01:00
Ilya Kantor
be007e78ef
remove cut
2018-02-06 13:07:22 +03:00
Khristinin Nikita
095af8b6f6
Fix misspeling
...
user.format - not exist in the code bellow.
Probably you mean `worker.slow`
2018-01-21 09:06:20 +02:00
Anton A. Zabirko
cb26b559bb
Clarity for this
...
A more ideal explanation of `this` assigning
2017-11-10 07:59:54 -08:00
Ilya Kantor
8977e933d7
Merge pull request #281 from usernamehw/patch-23
...
Update article.md
2017-11-01 08:58:41 +03:00
Ilya Kantor
b7df8ece5b
Merge pull request #282 from usernamehw/patch-24
...
Fix "ReferenceError: calculator is not defined"
2017-11-01 08:58:21 +03:00
Alexander
ab94743da8
Update task.md
2017-10-30 03:45:47 +03:00
Alexander
4fbb92baab
Fix "ReferenceError: calculator is not defined"
2017-10-30 03:43:25 +03:00
Alexander
62c866930f
Update article.md
2017-10-30 03:02:37 +03:00
Valerii Iatsko
8c6f614dc4
Fixed spy-decorator assignment test
...
Hi!
We should be checking here original function not spy to ensure that we are wrapping transparently.
The test wasn't working and probably that was just a "typo" to begin with.
This makes it work properly.
2017-10-01 09:34:43 +02:00
Alex Zvorygin
67790aa261
change incorrect variable name
...
solution and problem statement have the calls stored in `calls`, not `log`
2017-09-20 11:52:58 -04:00
Thierry Parmentelat
4121423fc0
flushing my list of typos when reaching the Objects chapter
2017-05-12 10:28:56 +02:00
Ilya Kantor
57dc058c49
typos
2017-04-17 21:45:55 +02:00
Ilya Kantor
bc9117e70f
minor
2017-03-28 10:55:51 +03:00
Ilya Kantor
97c8f22bbb
up
2017-03-21 17:14:05 +03:00
