166 lines
5.3 KiB
Markdown
166 lines
5.3 KiB
Markdown
# Nullish coalescing operator '??'
|
|
|
|
[recent browser="new"]
|
|
|
|
Here, in this article, we'll say that an expression is "defined" when it's neither `null` nor `undefined`.
|
|
|
|
The nullish coalescing operator is written as two question marks `??`.
|
|
|
|
The result of `a ?? b` is:
|
|
- if `a` is defined, then `a`,
|
|
- if `a` isn't defined, then `b`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In other words, `??` returns the first argument if it's not `null/undefined`. Otherwise, the second one.
|
|
|
|
The nullish coalescing operator isn't anything completely new. It's just a nice syntax to get the first "defined" value of the two.
|
|
|
|
We can rewrite `result = a ?? b` using the operators that we already know, like this:
|
|
|
|
```js
|
|
result = (a !== null && a !== undefined) ? a : b;
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
The common use case for `??` is to provide a default value for a potentially undefined variable.
|
|
|
|
For example, here we show `Anonymous` if `user` isn't defined:
|
|
|
|
```js run
|
|
let user;
|
|
|
|
alert(user ?? "Anonymous"); // Anonymous
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Of course, if `user` had any value except `null/undefined`, then we would see it instead:
|
|
|
|
```js run
|
|
let user = "John";
|
|
|
|
alert(user ?? "Anonymous"); // John
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
We can also use a sequence of `??` to select the first value from a list that isn't `null/undefined`.
|
|
|
|
Let's say we have a user's data in variables `firstName`, `lastName` or `nickName`. All of them may be undefined, if the user decided not to enter a value.
|
|
|
|
We'd like to display the user name using one of these variables, or show "Anonymous" if all of them are undefined.
|
|
|
|
Let's use the `??` operator for that:
|
|
|
|
```js run
|
|
let firstName = null;
|
|
let lastName = null;
|
|
let nickName = "Supercoder";
|
|
|
|
// shows the first defined value:
|
|
*!*
|
|
alert(firstName ?? lastName ?? nickName ?? "Anonymous"); // Supercoder
|
|
*/!*
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Comparison with ||
|
|
|
|
The OR `||` operator can be used in the same way as `??`, as it was described in the [previous chapter](info:logical-operators#or-finds-the-first-truthy-value).
|
|
|
|
For example, in the code above we could replace `??` with `||` and still get the same result:
|
|
|
|
```js run
|
|
let firstName = null;
|
|
let lastName = null;
|
|
let nickName = "Supercoder";
|
|
|
|
// shows the first truthy value:
|
|
*!*
|
|
alert(firstName || lastName || nickName || "Anonymous"); // Supercoder
|
|
*/!*
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
The OR `||` operator exists since the beginning of JavaScript, so developers were using it for such purposes for a long time.
|
|
|
|
On the other hand, the nullish coalescing operator `??` was added to JavaScript only recently, and the reason for that was that people weren't quite happy with `||`.
|
|
|
|
The important difference between them is that:
|
|
- `||` returns the first *truthy* value.
|
|
- `??` returns the first *defined* value.
|
|
|
|
In other words, `||` doesn't distinguish between `false`, `0`, an empty string `""` and `null/undefined`. They are all the same -- falsy values. If any of these is the first argument of `||`, then we'll get the second argument as the result.
|
|
|
|
In practice though, we may want to use default value only when the variable is `null/undefined`. That is, when the value is really unknown/not set.
|
|
|
|
For example, consider this:
|
|
|
|
```js run
|
|
let height = 0;
|
|
|
|
alert(height || 100); // 100
|
|
alert(height ?? 100); // 0
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
- The `height || 100` checks `height` for being a falsy value, and it really is.
|
|
- so the result is the second argument, `100`.
|
|
- The `height ?? 100` checks `height` for being `null/undefined`, and it's not,
|
|
- so the result is `height` "as is", that is `0`.
|
|
|
|
If the zero height is a valid value, that shouldn't be replaced with the default, then `??` does just the right thing.
|
|
|
|
## Precedence
|
|
|
|
The precedence of the `??` operator is rather low: `5` in the [MDN table](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Operators/Operator_Precedence#Table). So `??` is evaluated before `=` and `?`, but after most other operations, such as `+`, `*`.
|
|
|
|
So if we'd like to choose a value with `??` in an expression with other operators, consider adding parentheses:
|
|
|
|
```js run
|
|
let height = null;
|
|
let width = null;
|
|
|
|
// important: use parentheses
|
|
let area = (height ?? 100) * (width ?? 50);
|
|
|
|
alert(area); // 5000
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Otherwise, if we omit parentheses, then as `*` has the higher precedence than `??`, it would execute first, leading to incorrect results.
|
|
|
|
```js
|
|
// without parentheses
|
|
let area = height ?? 100 * width ?? 50;
|
|
|
|
// ...works the same as this (probably not what we want):
|
|
let area = height ?? (100 * width) ?? 50;
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Using ?? with && or ||
|
|
|
|
Due to safety reasons, JavaScript forbids using `??` together with `&&` and `||` operators, unless the precedence is explicitly specified with parentheses.
|
|
|
|
The code below triggers a syntax error:
|
|
|
|
```js run
|
|
let x = 1 && 2 ?? 3; // Syntax error
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
The limitation is surely debatable, but it was added to the language specification with the purpose to avoid programming mistakes, when people start to switch to `??` from `||`.
|
|
|
|
Use explicit parentheses to work around it:
|
|
|
|
```js run
|
|
*!*
|
|
let x = (1 && 2) ?? 3; // Works
|
|
*/!*
|
|
|
|
alert(x); // 2
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Summary
|
|
|
|
- The nullish coalescing operator `??` provides a short way to choose the first "defined" value from a list.
|
|
|
|
It's used to assign default values to variables:
|
|
|
|
```js
|
|
// set height=100, if height is null or undefined
|
|
height = height ?? 100;
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
- The operator `??` has a very low precedence, only a bit higher than `?` and `=`, so consider adding parentheses when using it in an expression.
|
|
- It's forbidden to use it with `||` or `&&` without explicit parentheses.
|